你好，你听见我们的声音吗？红热

纪录片你好，你听见我们的声音吗？红热在线播放视频资源由八一影院收集整理，本片由JurisPodnieks执导、未知等联合主演，你好，你听见我们的声音吗？红热是纪录题材中一部很不错的作品，值得各位网友娱乐观看，如果觉得不错记得分享转发给你的朋友一起看哦。Discord, distress, the threat of dissolution. Such is the prevailing spirit in the Soviet 　　Union today as vividly captured by "Soviets". Through striking photographs and probing 　　interviews, Juris Podnieks, a Latvian director, conveys the misery, resistance and 　　flickering hopes of people who are demanding much more than the Gorbachev reforms. 　　The very existence of such a work, which was made in 1988 and '89 and which has 　　been shown in some Soviet movie theaters, is of course evidence of how much has 　　changed in recent years. Yet as Hedrick Smith, the author of "The New Russians," 　　observes, the reforms have released ambiguous and often hostile feelings. 　　1 red hot 　　In the first, impressionistic program, Mr. Podnieks, a noted director of feature films, 　　heightens the facts with scenes of the nuclear disaster at Chernobyl and the aftermath 　　of the 1988 earthquake in Armenia and with the angry faces of striking workers at an 　　engine factory in Yaroslavl in central Russia. He has a case to make and knows how to 　　use his camera to make it. Do not look to "Soviets" for journalistic balance; even the tone 　　of the voice-overs separates earnest protestors from stuffy officials. 　　Unfortunately for the viewer, Mr. Podnieks appears to be much taken with a fellow 　　Latvian, the musician and poet Alexei Rybnikov, who begins the first program with 　　brooding banalities -- "We are lost because we have lost our beliefs" and "My weak feet 　　are made of clay" -- as he records his latest opera, "Holy Communion for Nonbelievers." 　　The synthesized music and synthetic philosophy, accompanied by newsreels of Lenin 　　and Stalin, make for an arduously arty opening. 　　Through Mr. Podnieks's lens, the Yaroslavl engine factory is straight out of Dickens. One 　　of the women, who seem to make up most of the work force, asks, "With only one free 　　day a week, when do we see our children? How much housekeeping can I do?" 　　Mr. Podnieks, doing his interviewing out of camera range, pins down a union 　　representative. "Why strike?" this man asks. "We're free to talk about anything." To Mr. 　　Podnieks's observation, "The air is still poisoned; the work is still heavy," the union 　　official counters, "If there is a little anger, take it as a natural female trait." A crane driver 　　comments that although the workers might have lost some of their fear, "we aren't 　　capable of much after these many years of silence." The pictures of the old-fashioned 　　factory add a smoky atmosphere to the words, leaving an image of frail hope choked by 　　decades of resignation. 　　Mr. Podnieks demonstrates his directorial touch as he moves evocatively from a 　　comment by the crane driver that she likes science fiction to eerie scenes of the 　　clean-up after the 1986 explosion at Chernobyl. The director has an eye for symbol and 　　a liking for morality tales. An art historian tells him that people have been stealing old 　　icons from the region, even though they are radioactive. The holy items, taken for gain, 　　may bring death. Mr. Podnieks can be obvious but in his hands even the 　　obvious has strength. 　　The first program ends with interviews with women who, despite warnings, have 　　returned to their homes near Chernobyl. Mr. Podnieks catches their mix of defiance 　　 and desperation . It is a mixture 　　that "Soviets" finds everywhere. 　　2 awakening 　　The second program brings interviews with a Russian Orthodox priest, in the shell of his 　　destroyed church, who longs to return to an earlier Russia, and with Andrei Sakharov, 　　who died in December 1989, looking ahead realistically and not very optimistically: "I don't 　　know whether we will be able to run the whole course, because we have failed so 　　many times." 　　Mr. Podnieks pays particular attention to the rising nationalism in his own Latvia, focusing 　　especially on Valdis Turins, a schoolteacher whom we see being carted away by police 　　during a demonstration. Mr. Turins is no more optimistic than Mr. Sakharov, but he clings 　　to the faith that now there is a chance for his people. 　　The program finds a similar spirit among the Armenians in the district of Nagorny 　　Karabakh who are demanding independence from the republic of Azerbaijan. A 　　newsreel shows a crowd listening to a member of the Communist Party Central 　　Committee offering this comfort: "Dear Comrades! The Central Committee of the party 　　loves you! Honestly!" The ensuing hoots and the pictures of Armenians who have been 　　beaten by Azerbaijani nationalists, perhaps abetted by the police, portend more violence 　　and possibly an end to what is now known as the Soviet Union. 　　3 do you hear us? 　　The series also contains interviews with disenchanted veterans of the war in 　　Afghanistan, with appealing young members of the Democratic Front and with 　　less-appealing anti-Semites. 　　4 the wall 　　Another program contains a chilling account of the desperate fight by a woman in the 　　republic of Uzbekistan in Central Asia against the accusation that she was not a virgin at 　　marriage, an offense that among the Uzbeks requires self-immolation. Mr. Podnieks's 　　camera, never objective, catches the insularity and suspiciousness in a region where 　　2,500 women a year try to burn themselves to death. 　　This episode contains interviews with residents of a town near Leningrad who are 　　protesting against a factory that emits noxious fumes . 　　There is also a candid conversation with Boris N. Yeltsin, the head of the Russian 　　Republic, who sees the increasing powers of Mikhail S. Gorbachev as "the beginning of 　　a new cult of personality." The accompanying pictures of Mr. Gorbachev looking 　　authoritarian leaves little doubt as to where Mr. Podnieks's sympathies lie. 　　5 face to face 　　In the final program, he returns to the Baltic States to meet the leaders of the Latvian 　　People's Front and also returns to Armenia, and its fight against the Muslim expansion. 　　"Soviets" gives immediacy to the economic, political, religious and ethnic demands now 　　roiling the country. It offers inspiration in the form of people standing up to state power, 　　but leaves little prospect for a quiet resolution to the clashing passions that have been 　　unloosed by the first breaths of freedom.